Though I have received many letters of support (my inbox is full of these, and for them I thank you) and the major bloggers have called for me to remain on as Chair, there are still some who doubt the sincerity of my apology to the player concerned, who - unlike those attempting to make hay from my mistake - is the person that matters here. I said that I would resign; to demonstrate the sincerity of my words and my apology, I will do just that.

With the increasingly high profile of the CSM in the wake of the Incarna Emergency Summit and the amazing turnout we had for the CSM7 elections, I have come to the conclusion that my two roles in EVE - that of the Chairman of the CSM as Alexander Gianturco, and the leader of Goonswarm as "The Mittani" are increasingly incompatible. It is, fundamentally, a problem of hats.

As the leader of Goonswarm I must be willing to make ruthless decisions and take actions that many players find objectionable - griefing, ganking, scamming, 'dishonorable' fleet tactics, espionage, metagaming, blowing up everyone who tries to mine Gallente Ice, sponsoring Hulkageddon, et cetera - whatever it takes to defend my people in this, the most exceedingly hostile galaxy to grace the internet. As Darius JOHNSON, the previous Goonswarm leader once said, "[Goonswarm] is not here to destroy /the/ game, but /your/ game.

Yet as Chairman of the CSM and Alexander Gianturco, I need to put a good face on CCP's experimental player democracy and keep my nose clean. Inevitably, these two roles conflict with one another; when Goonswarm does what it does in EVE, this reflects on the CSM as a whole, purely due to my position as both Chairman and alliance leader. If I abandon the brutalist tactics of an alliance leader in hopes of keeping the CSM's image pristine, I hamstring my people ingame and do a disservice to the line members who rely on me. In addition, the enemies of Goonswarm assault the CSM and CCP itself unfairly due to the in-game actions of our alliance.

After the successful restructuring of CCP, I am convinced that most of the hard work of the CSM is already done - CCP is now focusing on spaceships instead of avatars, and the success of CSM6 has led to a solid and competent crop of player representatives in CSM7 with a much greater turnout, demonstrating ever-more faith and trust from the playerbase in the concept of the CSM. This changes things for the CSM, as well as the Chairman title

During Goonswarm's highly successful Gallente Ice Interdiction there were calls for my resignation as Chairman; those calls increased when Goonswarm began to use false supercap sales as a method of closing the gap between us and our in-game enemies' supercap fleets. We are now planning an attempt to destroy Jita itself. All of these actions are entirely legitimate within the brutal world of EVE, yet, in the coming months, if I continue to hold the title of Chairman, CCP will be enduring one PR nightmare after another as Goonswarm's in-game actions unfairly reflect back upon the CSM as a whole through the Chairman title. It is increasingly important that the Chair be a GÇÿgood citizenGÇÖ in the game itself - and I cannot be a good citizen and simultaneously lead my alliance of magnificent bastards.

With CSM7's term beginning on April 4th, I now exercise my right as the winner of the election with 10,058 votes to decline the office of Chairman. It will then be up to CSM7 as a group to decide how to proceed regarding the Chair. As a member of the CSM without a title, what I do as the leader of Goonswarm will no longer unfairly reflect on the CSM as a whole - leaving me and my people free to do as we please without needing to consider corporate, political, or media ramifications every time we make a **** joke, offend someone, or sell a supercap made of vapor.

Bout time you showed up Princess.

I was starting to feel lonely without your pseud-internet legal garbage in here.

They are also expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow.

I didn't even vote for Mittani this time around (Dovi for CSM!... aww.) but the fact that CCP just told 10,058 subscribers to go f*** themselves is pretty damn stupid.

CCP Decides to ban our dear leader. We will make all of eve pay. Jita. Will. Burn.

Stories will be told for years of the destruction brought upon jita, no one is safe.

Well done NPC alts,

You just cleared Mittens of any sense of pandering to any role he needs to play and he is now free to leverage the full arsenal of goonswarm against you in any manner the TOS allows.

Yes, this means completely destroying Jita.

What does that CCP trailer say? "Your choices always come back around"

I'll just /popcorn and wait for you to cry and whine and beg on the same forums you gave birth to your worst enemy, reinvigorated with a hatred for all of you.

This will be fun~

He manned up to his mistakes and openly accepted his punishment in full. Personally, I believe that that is a trait of a true man. He was at a festival and was having fun. You can only criticize a person's character so much when they're drunk.

Mittens at least realizes the dichotomy of leading an alliance of incredibly amoral people and being Chairman.
Meanwhile you are so desperate for votes you were trying to lure them with PLEX, and scamming them to boot.
How convenient you don't hold yourself up to that same standard of moral purity you seem so eager to weigh others against.

You're implying that this wasn't our plan anyway. i've been stocking up ships and mods for weeks now.